When the Brand Is No Longer Human: Generative AI, Perceived Human Agency and the Future of Consumer-Brand Relationships
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55544/sjmars.5.3.10Keywords:
Generative artificial intelligence, consumer-brand relationships, perceived human agency, brand humanness, brand authenticity, AI-generated advertising, anthropomorphism, digital brandingAbstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is moving rapidly from a backstage marketing technology to a visible creator of advertisements, social-media content, brand stories, synthetic models and conversational communication. This transition raises a fundamental branding question: what happens to consumer-brand relationships when consumers perceive that meaningful communicative agency has shifted from humans to machines? Existing research documents consumer responses to AI-authored messages, AI disclosures, virtual influencers and synthetic advertising, but these streams remain fragmented and frequently emphasise immediate outcomes such as advertising attitudes, purchase intentions or credibility. This conceptual study integrates consumer-brand relationship theory, anthropomorphism and mind-perception research, brand-authenticity scholarship and emerging GenAI-marketing evidence to explain the relational consequences of AI-generated brand communication. It introduces perceived human agency as a central mechanism and develops an AI-Humanity Paradox: GenAI can simultaneously increase perceived innovativeness, novelty and creative capability while weakening brand humanness, authenticity and emotional sincerity. Comparative evidence from Coca-Cola's GenAI-generated Holidays Are Coming campaign and Levi's collaboration with Lalaland.ai demonstrates how these tensions become particularly salient when AI enters communication domains associated with heritage, emotion, identity and human representation. The paper further distinguishes AI-assisted from AI-authored communication and proposes that perceived replacement of human intention, rather than AI use per se, determines relational risk. The resulting framework contributes to emerging research on GenAI and branding by repositioning artificial content generation as a problem of agency attribution, authenticity and relationship meaning.
References
[1] Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379703400304
[2] Beverland, M. B. (2005). Crafting brand authenticity: The case of luxury wines. Journal of Management Studies, 42(5), 1003-1029. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00530.x
[3] Chan, H.-L., & Choi, T.-M. (2025). Using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in marketing: Development and practices. Journal of Business Research, 191, 115276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115276
[4] Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864-886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
[5] Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343-373. https://doi.org/10.1086/209515
[6] Gomes, S., Lopes, J. M., & Nogueira, E. (2025). Anthropomorphism in artificial intelligence: A game-changer for brand marketing. Future Business Journal, 11, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00423-y
[7] Grigsby, J. L., Michelsen, M., & Zamudio, C. (2025). Service ads in the era of generative AI: Disclosures, trust, and intangibility. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 84, 104231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104231
[8] Heimstad, S. B., Gaustad, T., Tafesse, W., & Wien, A. H. (2027). When AI ads backfire: Deconstructing consumer backlash to GenAI advertising. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 94, 105058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2026.105058
[9] Hermann, E., & Puntoni, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence and consumer behavior: From predictive to generative AI. Journal of Business Research, 180, 114720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114720
[10] Joel-Edgar, S., Chowdhury, S., Nagy, P., & Ren, S. (2025). Virtual influencers in social media versus the metaverse: Mind perception, blame judgements and brand trust. Journal of Business Research, 189, 115139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115139
[11] Jung, T., Koghut, M., Lee, E., & Kwon, O. (2025). Artificial creativity in luxury advertising: How trust and perceived humanness drive consumer response to AI-generated content. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 87, 104403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104403
[12] Kervyn, N., Fiske, S. T., & Malone, C. (2012). Brands as intentional agents framework: How perceived intentions and ability can map brand perception. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(2), 166-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.09.006
[13] Kirk, C. P., & Givi, J. (2025). The AI-authorship effect: Understanding authenticity, moral disgust, and consumer responses to AI-generated marketing communications. Journal of Business Research, 186, 114984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114984
[14] Koles, B., Audrezet, A., Moulard, J. G., Ameen, N., & McKenna, B. (2024). The authentic virtual influencer: Authenticity manifestations in the metaverse. Journal of Business Research, 170, 114325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114325
[15] Liu, F., & Wang, R. (2025). Fostering parasocial relationships with virtual influencers in the uncanny valley: Anthropomorphism, autonomy, and a multigroup comparison. Journal of Business Research, 186, 115024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115024
[16] MacInnis, D. J., & Folkes, V. S. (2017). Humanizing brands: When brands seem to be like me, part of me, and in a relationship with me. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(3), 355-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2016.12.003
[17] Maiolo, L. (2024). Levi's and Lalaland.ai collaboration crisis. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 32(1), e12527. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12527
[18] Morhart, F., Malar, L., Guevremont, A., Girardin, F., & Grohmann, B. (2015). Brand authenticity: An integrative framework and measurement scale. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2), 200-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.11.006
[19] Song, X., Lu, Y., & Yang, Q. (2024). The negative effect of virtual endorsers on brand authenticity and potential remedies. Journal of Business Research, 185, 114898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114898
[20] Thompson, J., Igarashi, R., Krowinska, A., & Logan-McFarlane, A. (2025). Is it real or not? Construction of meaning and identity in virtual influencer marketing. Journal of Business Research, 194, 115362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115362
[21] Volles, B. K., Park, J., Van Kerckhove, A., & Geuens, M. (2024). How and when do virtual influencers positively affect consumer responses to endorsed brands? Journal of Business Research, 183, 114863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114863
[22] Wu, L., Dodoo, N. A., & Wen, T. J. (2025). Disclosing AI's involvement in advertising to consumers: A task-dependent perspective. Journal of Advertising, 54(1), 20-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2024.2309929
[23] Wu, L. (2026). How consumers respond when brands disclose using AI in creating social media content: Examining brand personification and communication strategies. Journal of Product & Brand Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-09-2025-6302
[24] Zheng, X., Miao, M., Zhang, L., & Huang, L. (2024). Standing out or fitting in? How perceived autonomy affects virtual influencer marketing outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 185, 114917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114917
[25] Zhou, A., Liu, Y., & Dai, Y. (2026). Artificial yet credible: How virtual influencers overcome authenticity challenges. Journal of Business Research, 206, 115940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115940
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Stallion Journal for Multidisciplinary Associated Research Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

