Biomedical Titanium Alloy for Implant Application: Processing; Biofunction and Failure Mechanisms - Critical Review

Authors

  • Marwa J. Mohammed College of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology, IRAQ

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/sjmars.5.5.8

Keywords:

titanium alloys, biomedical engineering, orthopedic implants, dental implants, additive manufacturing, β-type titanium, porous implants, tribocorrosion, fatigue, surface engineering, implant standards

Abstract

Titanium and its alloys are widely used in orthopedic, dental, spinal and craniofacial devices because they offer a useful combination of high specific strength, corrosion resistance, fatigue capability and a stable oxide surface. Their long-term behavior, however, depends on much more than alloy composition alone. Manufacturing route, microstructure, defect population, architecture and surface condition can all influence elastic compatibility, fatigue, tribocorrosion, osseointegration and infection-related risk. This structured critical review brings together evidence from alloy design, additive manufacturing, surface engineering and implant-failure studies within a processing–microstructure–biofunction–failure framework. Rather than following a formal systematic-review protocol, the review uses a structured narrative search and gives priority to primary quantitative studies and current implant-material standards. Selected β-type alloys have shown elastic moduli of approximately 60–74 GPa, compared with values around 120 GPa for conventional Ti–6Al–4V, while retaining substantial strength. Studies of additively manufactured Ti–6Al–4V further show that defects, post-processing and physiological media can change the mechanism that limits fatigue performance. Overall, the literature does not support simple rules such as lower modulus, higher porosity, greater roughness or stronger antibacterial activity as universally desirable targets, because each can create competing effects on fatigue, corrosion, local stress concentration or host-cell response. A more useful approach is to evaluate alloy chemistry, architecture, defects, surface modification, post-processing, cleaning and sterilization together in relation to the mechanical and biological demands of the intended implant.

References

[1] El-Bassyouni, G. T., Mouneir, S. M., & El-Shamy, A. M. (2025). Advances in surface modifications of titanium and its alloys: implications for biomedical and pharmaceutical applications. Multiscale and Multidisciplinary Modeling, Experiments and Design, 8, 265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41939-025-00823-1

[2] Siony, N., Vuong, L., Lundaajamts, O., & Kadkhodaei, S. (2022). Computational design of corrosion-resistant and wear-resistant titanium alloys for orthopedic implants. Materials Today Communications, 33, 104465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104465

[3] Yehia, H. M., El-Tantawy, A., Elkady, O. A., Ghayad, I. M., & Daoush, W. M. (2024). Fabrication and characterization of Ti–12Mo/xAl2O3 bio-inert composite for dental prosthetic applications. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 12, 1412586. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1412586

[4] Nguyen, H. D., Pramanik, A., Basak, A., Dong, Y., Prakash, C., Debnath, S., Shankar, S., Jawahir, I., Dixit, S., & Buddhi, D. (2022). A critical review on additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V alloy: microstructure and mechanical properties. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 18, 4641–4661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.04.055

[5] Lu, F., Ma, Q., Liu, E., Wei, R., Bai, J., Gao, Q., & Qi, J. (2025). Advancements in understanding the microstructure and properties of additive manufacturing Ti-6Al-4V alloy: A comprehensive review. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 1027, 180543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2025.180543

[6] Li, G., Chandra, S., Rashid, R. A. R., Palanisamy, S., & Ding, S. (2022). Machinability of additively manufactured titanium alloys: A comprehensive review. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 75, 72–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.01.007

[7] Wu, Y., He, W., Ma, H., Nie, X., Liang, X., Pan, J., Wang, S., Shang, M., & Cheng, L. (2024). Titanium alloy materials with very high cycle fatigue: A review. Materials, 17, 2987. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17122987

[8] Tshephe, T. S., Akinwamide, S. O., Olevsky, E., & Olubambi, P. A. (2022). Additive manufacturing of titanium-based alloys—A review of methods, properties, challenges, and prospects. Heliyon, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09041

[9] Calazans Neto, J. V., Celles, C. A. S., de Andrade, C. S. A. F., Afonso, C. R. M., Nagay, B. E., & Barão, V. A. R. (2024). Recent Advances and Prospects in β-type Titanium Alloys for Dental Implants Applications. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 10(10), 6029–6060. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c00963

[10] Raja, C. P., Karthik Babu, N. B., Rajesh Kannan, A., & Shanmugam, V. (2024). Progress in the Optimization of Compositional Design and Thermomechanical Processing of Metastable β Ti Alloys for Biomedical Applications. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 10(6), 3528–3547. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01912

[11] Xue, T., Attarilar, S., Liu, S., Liu, J., Song, X., Li, L., Zhao, B., & Tang, Y. (2020). Surface Modification Techniques of Titanium and its Alloys to Functionally Optimize Their Biomedical Properties: Thematic Review. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 8, 603072. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.603072

[12] Lu, X., Wu, Z., Xu, K., Wang, X., Wang, S., Qiu, H., Li, X., & Chen, J. (2021). Multifunctional Coatings of Titanium Implants Toward Promoting Osseointegration and Preventing Infection: Recent Developments. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 9, 783816. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.783816

[13] Toosi, S., Javid-Naderi, M. J., Tamayol, A., Ebrahimzadeh, M. H., Yaghoubian, S., & Mousavi Shaegh, S. A. (2024). Additively manufactured porous scaffolds by design for treatment of bone defects. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 11, 1252636. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1252636

[14] Dotta, T. C., et al. (2023). Effect of tribocorrosion on surface-treated titanium alloy implants: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 145, 106008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106008

[15] Park, J. H., Olivares-Navarrete, R., Baier, R. E., Meyer, A. E., Tannenbaum, R., Boyan, B. D., & Schwartz, Z. (2012). Effect of cleaning and sterilization on titanium implant surface properties and cellular response. Acta Biomaterialia, 8(5), 1966–1975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.026

[16] Gordin, D. M., Gloriant, T., Texier, G., Thibon, I., Ansel, D., Duval, J. L., & Nagel, M. D. (2004). Development of a β-type Ti-12Mo-5Ta alloy for biomedical applications: cytocompatibility and metallurgical aspects. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 15(8), 885–891. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000036276.32211.31

[17] Wei, T. Y., Huang, J. C., Chao, C. Y., Wei, L. L., Tsai, M. T., & Chen, Y. H. (2018). Microstructure and elastic modulus evolution of TiTaNb alloys. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 86, 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.06.047

[18] Luo, J. P., Huang, Y. J., Xu, J. Y., Sun, J. F., Dargusch, M. S., Hou, C. H., Ren, L., Wang, R. Z., Ebel, T., & Yan, M. (2020). Additively manufactured biomedical Ti-Nb-Ta-Zr lattices with tunable Young's modulus: Mechanical property, biocompatibility, and proteomics analysis. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 114, 110903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.110903

[19] Bandyopadhyay, A., Shivaram, A., Tarafder, S., Sahasrabudhe, H., Banerjee, D., & Bose, S. (2017). In Vivo Response of Laser Processed Porous Titanium Implants for Load-Bearing Implants. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 45(1), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1673-8

[20] Van Hooreweder, B., Apers, Y., Lietaert, K., & Kruth, J.-P. (2017). Improving the fatigue performance of porous metallic biomaterials produced by Selective Laser Melting. Acta Biomaterialia, 47, 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.10.005

[21] Hedayati, R., Amin Yavari, S., & Zadpoor, A. A. (2017). Fatigue crack propagation in additively manufactured porous biomaterials. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 76, 457–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.091

[22] Bandyopadhyay, A., Mitra, I., Shivaram, A., Dasgupta, N., & Bose, S. (2019). Direct comparison of additively manufactured porous titanium and tantalum implants towards in vivo osseointegration. Additive Manufacturing, 28, 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.04.025

[23] Piñera-Avellaneda, D., Buxadera-Palomero, J., Ginebra, M.-P., Calero, J. A., Manero, J. M., & Rupérez, E. (2023). Surface competition between osteoblasts and bacteria on silver-doped bioactive titanium implant. Biomaterials Advances, 146, 213311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213311

[24] Licausi, M.-P., Igual Muñoz, A. N., & Amigó, V. (2013). Influence of the fabrication process and fluoride content on the tribocorrosion behaviour of Ti–6Al–4V biomedical alloy in artificial saliva. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 20, 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.01.019

[25] Royhman, D., Patel, M., Runa, M. J., Jacobs, J. J., Hallab, N. J., Wimmer, M. A., & Mathew, M. T. (2015). Fretting-corrosion in hip implant modular junctions: New experimental set-up and initial outcome. Tribology International, 91, 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2015.04.032

[26] Schwartz, Z., Raz, P., Zhao, G., Barak, Y., Tauber, M., Yao, H., & Boyan, B. D. (2008). Effect of micrometer-scale roughness of the surface of Ti–6Al–4V pedicle screws in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 90(11), 2485–2498. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00499

[27] Hogg, W. W., Jamal, M., Zuckschwerdt, N. W., Hess, C. M., Bose, S., & Bandyopadhyay, A. (2026). Corrosion-fatigue of additively manufactured Ti–6Al–4V. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 175, 107289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.107289

[28] International Organization for Standardization. (2025). ISO 5832-2:2025, Implants for surgery—Metallic materials—Part 2: Unalloyed titanium.

[29] International Organization for Standardization. (2021). ISO 5832-3:2021, Implants for surgery—Metallic materials—Part 3: Wrought titanium 6-aluminium 4-vanadium alloy.

[30] International Organization for Standardization. (2024). ISO 5832-11:2024, Implants for surgery—Metallic materials—Part 11: Wrought titanium 6-aluminium 7-niobium alloy.

[31] International Organization for Standardization. (2019). ISO 5832-14:2019, Implants for surgery—Metallic materials—Part 14: Wrought titanium 15-molybdenum 5-zirconium 3-aluminium alloy.

[32] Kontakis, M. G., Diez-Escudero, A., Hariri, H., Andersson, B., Järhult, J. D., & Hailer, N. P. (2021). Antimicrobial and osteoconductive properties of two different types of titanium silver coating. European Cells & Materials, 41, 694–706. https://doi.org/10.22203/eCM.v041a45

[33] Zhao, Q.-M., Li, B., Yu, F.-X., Li, Y.-K., Wu, J.-S., Peng, Z., He, J., Han, Q.-S., Zhang, L.-B., Yi, L., Xu, R.-S., & Jiao, Y. (2021). Cu-Co Co-Doped Microporous Coating on Titanium with Osteogenic and Antibacterial Properties. Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology, 17(7), 1435–1447. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbn.2021.3120

[34] Zhuang, Y., Ren, L., Zhang, S., Wei, X., Yang, K., & Dai, K. (2021). Antibacterial effect of a copper-containing titanium alloy against implant-associated infection induced by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Acta Biomaterialia, 119, 472–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.10.026

[35] Lyons, R., Newell, A., Ghadimi, P., & Papakostas, N. (2021). Environmental impacts of conventional and additive manufacturing for the production of Ti-6Al-4V knee implant: A life cycle approach. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 112, 787–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06367-7

Downloads

Published

2026-10-14

How to Cite

J. Mohammed, M. (2026). Biomedical Titanium Alloy for Implant Application: Processing; Biofunction and Failure Mechanisms - Critical Review. Stallion Journal for Multidisciplinary Associated Research Studies, 5(5), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.55544/sjmars.5.5.8

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.