A Review of Environmental Monitoring, Applications, and Categories
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55544/sjmars.5.2.12Keywords:
Aquatic ecology, bioindicator, biomonitoring, aquatic invertebratesAbstract
Overview of the ideas, actual applications, and predicted future developments of bio monitoring techniques and bio indicators utilized for river ecosystems and what other organisms are present therein. The most common river bio monitoring indicators, which can be used independently or in combination, are periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish. A review and critical assessment were conducted to track ecological change through the use of land and aquatic invertebrates as managing tools, their applicability and their worth for evaluating the effects of pollution on a variety of environmental issues. Scientists used techniques for biomonitoring, and to evaluate the environmental health of rivers and streams, a biotic indices and multimetric methodologies are most frequently utilized. However, functional metrics are being used as an additional strategy for expressing ecological integrity. Additionally, recent studies have shown how effectively molecular methods may be used to improve taxonomic resolutions and detect genetic diversity in river bio monitoring. Biomonitoring aquatic metal contamination is a widespread problem that has received a lot of attention, and insects, bivalve mollusks, gastropods, zooplankton, algae, macrophytes, fish, and amphibians are considered biological indicators and contrasted for their benefits and drawbacks in actual biological monitoring of aquatic metal contamination. The common bio monitoring methods bioaccumulation, biochemical changes, observation of morphology models, techniques at the population and community levels, and behavior are all covered. Among the potential uses of biomonitoring are the assessment of actual water-polluted metals, biotreatment, toxicity expectation, and the study of toxicological mechanisms. For the biomonitoring of other perspectives on metal pollution in aquatic habitats are offered.
References
Allan, J. D. 1995. Stream ecology: structure and function of running waters. Chapman and Hall, London. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3270050209.
Behan-Pelletier, V. M. 1999. Oribatid mite biodiversity in agroecosystems: role for bioindication. Agriculture Ecosystems& Environment, 1-3:411–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00046-8.
Andersen, A. N.; J. A. Ludwig; L. M. Lowe and D. Rentz. 2001. Grasshopper biodiversity and bioindicators in Australian tropical savannas: Responses to disturbance in Kakadu National Park. Austral Ecology 26(3):213–222. DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2001.01106.x.
Parmar, T. K., D. Rawtani and Y. K. Agrawal. 2016. Bioindicators: the natural indicator of environmental pollution. Frontiers in Life Science, 9(2): 110-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/21553769.2016.1162753.
Hodkinson, I. D. and J. K. Jackson. 2005. Terrestrial and Aquatic Invertebrates Bioindicators for Environmental Monitoring, with Particular Reference to Mountain Ecosystems. Environmental Management, 35(5): 649–666. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-004-0211-x
Clements, W. H.; D. M. Carlisle; L. A. Courtney, and E. A. Harrahy. 2009. Integrating observational and experimental approaches to demonstrate causation in stream biomonitoring studies. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21(6):1138–1146. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620210605
Dole´dec, S.; B. Statzner, and M. Bournard. 1999. Species traits for future biomonitoring across ecoregions: Patterns along a human-impacted river. Freshwater Biology, 42(4):737–758. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00509.x
Wiersma, G. B. (2004). Environmental Monitoring, CRC Press, USA. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203495476.
Subramaniam, Sh., N. Raju, A. Ganesan, N. Rajavel, M. Chenniappan, C. Prakash, S. Dixit. 2022. Artificial intelligence technologies for forecasting air pollution and human health: a narrative review. Sustainability, 14(16): 9951. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169951
Hosmani, Sh. P. 2013. Fresh Water Algae as Indicators of Water Quality. Universal Journal of Environmental Research and Technology. Technol, 3(4): 473-482. www.environmentaljournal.org.
Fauvel, G. 1999. Diversity of Heteroptera in agroecosystems: role of sustainability and bioindication. Agriculture, Ecosys-tems and Environment 74(1-3):275–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8809(99)00039-0
Benton, M. J. and S. I. Guttman. 1990. Relationship of Allozyme Genotype to Survivorship of Mayflies (Stenonema femoratum) Exposed to Copper. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 9(3):271– 276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1467590.
Nhiwatiwa, T.; T. Dalu and T. Sithole. 2017. Assessment of river quality in a subtropical Austral river system: a combined approach using benthic diatoms and macroinvertebrates. Appl Water Sci, 7:4785-4792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-017-0599-0.
Charvet, S.; M. C. Roger; B. Faessel and M. Lafont. 1998. Biomonitoring of fresh water ecosystems by the use of biological traits. Annales de Limnologie- International Journal of Limnology, 34(4): 455–464.
Claret, C.; P. Marmonier; M. J. Dole-Olivier; M. C. des Chatelliers; A. Boulton and E. Castella. 1999. A functional classification of interstitial invertebrates: Supplementing measures of biodiversity using species traits and habitat affinities. Archiv fu¨r Hydrobiologie 145(4): 385– 403. DOI: 10.1127/archive- hydrobiol/145/1999/385
Osborn, Rae. 2022. Recent insights into the use of invertebrates as indicators of habitat quality. Science Reviews Biology, 1(1):31-35. DOI:10.57098/SciRevs.Biology.1.1.5.
Gresens, S.; R. F. Smith; A. Sutton-Grier; M. Kenney. 2009. Benthic macroinvertebrates as indicators of water quality: the intersection of science and policy. Terr. Arthropod Rev. 2(2): 99-128. DOI:10.11630/187498209x12525675906077.
Pinilla-Cortés, P. C. and J. A. Moreno-Gutiérrez. 2019. Attributes of Biothic Indicators as an Instrument for Assessing Ecosystem Integrity. Open Access Library Journal, 06 (07): 1-4. DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1105540.
Frouz, J. 1999. Use of soil dwelling Diptera (Insecta, Diptera) as bioindicators: a review of ecological requirements and response to disturbance. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 74:167–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00036-5.
Forbes, V. E.; P. Calow and V. Grimm. 2018. Integrating Ecotoxicology in to Regulatory Decision-Making for Sustainable Chemical Management. Environment Science and Technology, 52(22), 12820-12829.
Artiola, J. F.; I. L. Pepper and M. L. Brusseau. 2004. Environmental Monitoring and Characterization, Elsevier academic Press, San Diego.
Deidda, I.; R. Russo; R. Bonaventura; C. Costa; F. Zito and N. Lampiasi. 2021. Neurotoxicity in marine invertebrates: An update. Biology, 10(2): 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10020161.
Singh, S. 1998. Environmental Geography, Prayag Pustak Bhawan, India.
Fremling, C. R. 1989. Hexagenia Mayflies: Biological Monitors of Water Quality in the Upper Mississippi River. Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science, 55: 139-143.
Saxena, H. M. (2017) Environmental Geography, Rawat Publications, New Delhi.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Stallion Journal for Multidisciplinary Associated Research Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

