Assessing Groundwater Quality in Prayagraj City: Spatial Patterns of pH, Hardness, TDS and Major Ions

Authors

  • Dr. Sushila Department of Geography, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, INDIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/sjmars.5.5.2

Keywords:

groundwater quality, Prayagraj, total dissolved solids, hardness, water quality index, IS 10500:2012

Abstract

Tube wells supply about 77% of Prayagraj’s piped water, so the chemical quality of its groundwater bears directly on public health and on the condition of its water infrastructure. This study examines ten parameters (temperature, pH, total hardness, turbidity, dissolved oxygen, total dissolved solids (TDS), calcium, magnesium, chloride and bicarbonate) at 16 sites in Prayagraj city and compares them with the Indian drinking-water standard IS 10500:2012 and WHO guidance. pH (7.2–7.8) and chloride (49–94 mg/L) met the standards at every site. Hardness (198–329 mg/L), TDS (341–811 mg/L), calcium, magnesium and alkalinity exceeded the acceptable limits at most sites, but none exceeded a permissible limit. Turbidity (0.9–7.1 NTU) was the only parameter above a permissible limit, at six sites, and every site exceeded the acceptable limit for at least five of the seven parameters assessed. A weighted-arithmetic water quality index ranged from 20.7 to 103.3, placing one site in the excellent and two in the unfit class, with turbidity supplying about three-quarters of the index value on average. Civil Lines had the highest TDS and magnesium and the lowest dissolved oxygen, whereas Allenganj had the lowest TDS but the second-highest turbidity, so no part of the city is uniformly better. TDS was significantly correlated only with magnesium (r = 0.56, p = 0.024). The results indicate a water resource that is usable under BIS provisions yet falls short of acceptable limits almost everywhere, and they point to turbidity control, selective treatment, wider parameter coverage and repeated, georeferenced monitoring as priorities.

References

[1] APHA, AWWA, & WEF. (2017). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (23rd ed.). American Public Health Association.

[2] Bureau of Indian Standards. (2012). Drinking water: Specification (IS 10500:2012, Second revision). Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

[3] Brown, R. M., McClelland, N. I., Deininger, R. A., & O’Connor, M. F. (1972). A water quality index: Crashing the psychological barrier. In W. A. Thomas (Ed.), Indicators of environmental quality (pp. 173–182). Plenum Press.

[4] Catling, L. A., Abubakar, I., Lake, I. R., Swift, L., & Hunter, P. R. (2008). A systematic review of analytical observational studies investigating the association between cardiovascular disease and drinking water hardness. Journal of Water and Health, 6(4), 433–442.

[5] Chapman, D. (Ed.). (1996). Water quality assessments: A guide to the use of biota, sediments and water in environmental monitoring (2nd ed.). UNESCO/WHO/UNEP; E & FN Spon.

[6] Jal Kal Vibhag, Prayagraj. (n.d.). Water supply records [Unpublished departmental data]. Prayagraj Nagar Nigam.

[7] Patil, P. N., Sawant, D. V., & Deshmukh, R. N. (2012). Physico-chemical parameters for testing of water: A review. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 3(3), 1194–1207.

[8] Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India. (2011). Census of India 2011. Government of India.

[9] World Health Organization. (2017). Guidelines for drinking-water quality: Fourth edition incorporating the first addendum. WHO.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-01

How to Cite

Sushila. (2026). Assessing Groundwater Quality in Prayagraj City: Spatial Patterns of pH, Hardness, TDS and Major Ions. Stallion Journal for Multidisciplinary Associated Research Studies, 5(5), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.55544/sjmars.5.5.2

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.